Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Almost a year since my last post. I think that's the longest gap so far, but the good thing is I'm posting again. It's 5:00pm, but I'm tired mostly in the eyes. I've been thinking about my trip to the Philippines a lot. There is quite a bit that could be said about my experience there. At this point I'd rather leave that to pictures and random discussions, and hope I don't forget too much if I ever really want to put those memories to ink/key.

The big question I put to myself while I was there wasn't really a question, but I guess something that was influencing me while I was there. Most basically it can be put as this-> what's special about the Philippines? Is it that it has a strong history? From what I learned the prehistoric times in the Philippines took place during the flourishing of Ancient Greek antiquity. Relatively all that has occured in the Philippines has gone on in the shadow of the more prominent Asian civilizations more or less the West. Is it that there is such a stark contrast between first world Makati and the third world slums around the corner? My limited life experience with ghettos in developing countries (a mission trip to Mexico while I was 7th grade, a trip through the West Bank)buffered the surprise I think some of my family expected to see in me as dirt poor children pressed their faces against my tinted window in order to see if there was a handout inside. I wouldn't say I am numb, but I've seen it before. Is it in the things that only the Philippines has- this fruit or that beach? Or in the things that are distinctly Filipino?

I'd have to spend a great deal of time to really ascertain what is special about the Philippines if I went about it by asking those questions. I'm not really asking what is special about the Philippines, I'm asking what makes me belong to this place. This question is infinitely more important to me. I continue to reflect on the Philippines through the perspective that it is the land where my mother was born, and where my family continues to live. Every part of it, from the pleasure of halo halo to the travesties elicited by the corrupt government and politicians are in some part mine.

I think the question I will begin to ask myself is how I take ownership of these things- of the Philippines. This isn't ownership in the sense that I am indebted to solve all its problems or even take up residence there. It's also not ownership in the sense that I take advantage of all that is good there. It's ownership in the sense of belonging. The question as to why I belong there are easily answered. It's familial- ancestral. But now I will ask how I am filipino.

I know I will never truly belong there. I am American, and I am from California- Santa Cruz. But the faint tug that has kept me from becoming American in the same sense as my classmates comes from across the Pacific. I guess that's the mestizo plight. You never really belong here or there. Sometimes I can't help but sympathize with the nationalist/racist who thinks true citizenship is impossible for someone like me. In some acute sense they are right. Though I'd probably never let them know about it- it's probably not for them to understand.

Having returned home I am proud of what is there- in me. I've always known where my family comes from, but it was a rare opportunity to see what those places really look, feel, and smell like. In those two weeks my identity grew incredibly more complex. It seems cliche to think about it in this way, but I don't think it has to be. I don't think it was just a matter of seeing the manila smog, the jeepneys, the sigsig, the barrios. It was confronting that part of my spirit.

2 comments:

Hot Sam said...

I'm part Irish, part Italian, part Lithuanian, and part German. I'm 100% mutt.

Am I less of a person because I don't have a uniquely identifiable place of origin or a national culture (distinct from American culture) to adopt?

My family came to America nearly a century before I was born. Why should I feel any affinity to Ireland, Lithuania, Italy, or Germany?

My family eats lasagna for thanksgiving. I lived in Germany with the Army and learned to speak German. I'm Irish on St. Patrick's Day, but so is everyone else. When someone asks, "What's for dinner?" I can say "Shit on a platter" in Lithuanian.

Am I supposed to look back at where I came from, or look forward to where I'm going?

Why did my ancestors leave where they were to come here? The answer is likely because it sucked where they were. Their customs and traditions were either imposed upon them or adopted by them because of a ruling class which oppressed them, or failed to enable them to adapt to their geo-political environment. So why should we continue those traditions?

I am indeed interested in my roots, but it does not consume my thoughts. It doesn't shape my identity. If you're a Creationist, then we were all made in God's image, no matter what piece of dirt your great-great grandmother was born on. If you're an evolutionist, then we all crawled out of Africa. I'm an African-American.

Tradition, family pressure, social solidarity, and identity politics are the largest reasons why people cling to dreams of far-away lands that are not their own.

Some African officers with whom I went to my Officer Basic Course used to joke about black Americans who came to Africa trying to find their "roots." When the Africans looked at them, they didn't see relatives. They saw Americans.

Just my opinion.

Yes, the Philippines has (or have) lived in the shadow of other nations: China, Japan, Spain, the US. But it is a great nation with a great people and a great history who have endured tremendous hardship. Greatness is not derived from the ability to conquer other lands. But if it wishes to develop a stable economy and government, it must adopt tried and true models of success and reject the false hopes, empty promises, and oppression of socialism, oligarchy, and religious dogma.

Andrew said...

"Am I less of a person because I don't have a uniquely identifiable place of origin or a national culture (distinct from American culture) to adopt?"

This strikes me as non sequitur. Where is the suggestion that you are less human?

The post is primarily about identity, construed in the phenomenological sense. That is, your identity takes on the world that surrounds it. So you are the Robert who speaks Lithuanian, lived in Germany, and taught at Berkeley. In speaking this way, your heritage is very much part of your identity.

Living in a collegiate atmosphere, I am no stranger to the nauseating inundation of tolerance based initiatives (APASA,GSA,BSU...), But I do think it is a healthy practice to get in touch with what made you the way you are. Beyond it being a matter of personal discovery, a strengthening of the affection you may share for people who live across the world from you but could very well be your cousin seems to me to be a simple good.